Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Ramipril and Felodipine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

 

B. Raja1 and A. Lakshmana Rao2*

1Anurag Pharmacy College, Ananthagiri- 508 206, A.P., India.

2*V.V. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gudlavalleru- 521 356, A.P., India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: dralrao@gmail.com

 

 

ABSTRACT:

A simple, rapid, accurate and precise isocratic reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed and validated for simultaneous estimation of Ramipril and Felodipine in tablet dosage forms. The chromatographic separation was carried out on Hypersil BDS C18 column (150 x 4.6 mm; 5µ) with a mixture of phosphate buffer pH 5.5: acetonitrile (40: 60 V/V) as a mobile phase; at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. UV detection was performed at 243 nm. The retention times were 2.844 min and 5.727 min for Ramipril and Felodipine respectively. Calibration plots were linear (r2=1) over the concentration range of 5-30 µg/mL for both Ramipril and Felodipine. The method was validated for linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity. The proposed method was successfully used for quantitative analysis of Ramipril and Felodipine tablets. No interference from any component of pharmaceutical dosage form was observed. Validation studies revealed that the method is specific, rapid, reliable and reproducible. The high recovery and low relative standard deviation confirm the suitability of the proposed method for routine estimation of Ramipril and Felodipine in bulk and tablet dosage form.

 

KEYWORDS: Ramipril, Felodipine, HPLC, Validation.

 


INTRODUCTION:

Ramipril (Fig. 1) is an ACE inhibitor, indicated for the treatment of hypertension1. It may be used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Chemically it is (2S,3aS,6aS)-1[(S)-N-[(S)-1-Carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]alanyl]octahydrocyclopenta [b]pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, 1-ethyl ester. Ramipril lowers blood pressure by inhibiting angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and is believed to be primarily suppression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system2.

 

Felodipine (Fig. 2) is a calcium channel blocker, indicated for the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris3. Chemically it is ± ethyl methyl 4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylate. Felodipine reversibly competes for dihydropyridine binding sites, blocks voltage-dependent Ca++ currents4.

 

Fig. 1: Molecular structure of Ramipril

 

Fig. 2: Molecular structure of Felodipine

The approach of combination therapy may be theoretically favored by the fact that multiple factors contribute to the hypertension and achieving control of BP with single agent that acts through one particular mechanism may be unrealistic. Combining the second agent may lead to better control, acting by complimentary mechanism5.

 

Literature survey reveals that few spectrophotometric6, spectrofluorimetric, HPLC7 and LC-MS8 methods were reported for simultaneous estimation of Ramipril and Felodipine in combination dosage form. Therefore, an attempt has been made to develop an accurate, rapid and reproducible RP-HPLC9 method for simultaneous determination of Ramipril and Felodipine in tablet dosage form and validate it, in accordance with ICH10 guidelines.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chromatographic conditions:

Separation was performed with Waters HPLC equipped with a pump 2695, auto sampler and UV detector. Empower2 software was applied for data collecting and processing. The separation was achieved on a Hypersil BDS C18 column (150 x 4.6 mm, 5 µ). The mobile phase consisted of phosphate buffer pH 5.5: acetonitrile in the ratio of 40: 60 V/V. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and UV detection was performed at 243 nm. The mobile phase was shaken on an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. The resulting transparent mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45 µ membrane filter. The injection volume was 20 µL and all the experiments were performed at temperature 30C. The run time was set at 10 min.

 

Chemicals and reagents:

Pharmaceutical grade of Ramipril and Felodipine were kindly supplied as gift samples by Chandra Labs, Hyderabad, India. Commercially available TRIASYN tablets were purchased from local market. Tablets claimed to contain 5 mg of Ramipril and 5 mg of Felodipine have been utilized in the present work. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate and orthophosphoric acid of AR Grade were obtained from S.D. Fine Chemicals Ltd., Mumbai, India. HPLC grade acetonitrile was purchased from E. Merck (India) Ltd., Mumbai, India. HPLC grade water obtained from Milli Q water purification system was used throughout the study.

 

Preparation of standard solution:

Accurately weigh and transfer 5 mg of Ramipril and 5 mg of Felodipine working standard into 25 mL volumetric flask, add about 15 mL of diluent and sonicate to dissolve it completely and make volume up to the mark with diluent (stock solution), from this stock solution pipette out 10 mL into 100 mL volumetric flask and dilute up to the mark with diluent. Mix well and filter through 0.45 µ filter.

 

Preparation of sample solution:

Twenty tablets were accurately weighed, their mean weight was determined and they were mixed and finally powdered. Transfer the sample equivalent to 5 mg of Ramipril and 5 mg of Felodipine into a 25 mL volumetric flask. Add about 15 mL of diluent and sonicate to dissolve it completely and make volume up to the mark with diluent. Mix well and filter through 0.45 µ filter, from this stock solution pipette out 10 mL into 100 mL volumetric flask and dilute upto the mark with diluent. Mix well and filter through 0.45 µ filter.

 

Method validation:

The method was validated in accordance with ICH guidelines. The parameters assessed were linearity, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision, reproducibility and robustness etc.

 

Linearity:

Several aliquots of standard solutions of Ramipril and Felodipine were taken in different 10 mL volumetric flasks and diluted up to the mark with mobile phase such that the final concentrations were 5 to 30 µg/mL for both Ramipril and Felodipine. Evaluation of the two drugs was performed with UV detector at 243 nm, peak area was recorded for all the peaks. The correlation coefficient values were R2=1 for both Ramipril and Felodipine. The results show that an excellent correlation exists between peak area and concentration of drugs within the concentration range indicated.

 

Limit of detection and limit of quantification:

The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of the developed method were determined by injecting progressively low concentrations of the standard solutions using the developed HPLC method. The LOD for Ramipril and Felodipine were found to be 2.86 µg/mL and 2.21 µg/mL respectively. The LOQ for Ramipril and Felodipine were found to be 8.66 µg/mL and 6.71 µg/mL respectively.

 

Accuracy:

The accuracy of the method was assessed by recovery studies of Ramipril and Felodipine in the dosage form at three concentration levels. A fixed amount of preanalyzed sample was taken and standard drug was added at 50%, 100% and 150% levels. Each level was repeated three times. The contents of Ramipril and Felodipine per tablet were calculated. The % mean recoveries of Ramipril and Felodipine were 99.11% and 98.69% that shows there is no interference from excipients and the lower values of RSD of assay indicate the method is accurate.

 

Precision:

The precision was determined for both the drugs Ramipril and Felodipine in terms of intra-day and inter-day precision. For intra-day precision evaluation, a standard solution of fixed concentration was injected at various time intervals and %RSD for Ramipril and Felodipine were 0.08% and 0.21% respectively (limit %RSD < 2.0%). In addition, the inter-day precision was studied by injecting the same concentration of standard solution on consecutive days and the %RSD for Ramipril and Felodipine were 0.43% and 0.33% respectively (limit %RSD < 2.0%).

 

 

Ruggedness:

The ruggedness of the method was determined by carrying out the experiment on different instruments by different operators using different columns of similar types, which demonstrated that the developed HPLC method is rugged.

 

Robustness:

Robustness of the method was determined by making slight changes in the chromatographic conditions like mobile phase composition and flow rate. It was observed that there were no marked changes in the chromatograms, which demonstrated that the HPLC method so developed is robust.

 

Specificity:

Specificity is the ability of the analytical method to measure the analyte response in the presence of interferences including degradation products and related substances. No interference from any of the excipients was found at retention times of the examined drugs. These results demonstrate the absence of interference from other materials in the pharmaceutical formulations and therefore confirm the specificity of the proposed method.

 

Assay:

20 µL of each standard and sample solution were injected and from the peak area of Ramipril and Felodipine, amount of each drug in samples were computed. The result of assay undertaken yielded 99.46% and 100.09% of label claim of Ramipril and Felodipine respectively. 

 

Table 1: Optimized chromatographic conditions of Ramipril and Felodipine

Parameter

Condition

Mobile phase

Phosphate buffer: acetonitrile (40: 60, V/V)

pH

5.5

Diluent

Mobile phase

Column

Hypersil BDS C18 column (150 x4.6 mm, 5μ)

Column temperature

300C

Wave length

243 nm

Injection volume

20 µL

Flow rate

1.0 mL/min

Run time

10 min

 

Table 2: Linearity results of Ramipril and Felodipine

Concentration of Ramipril (μg/mL)

Area

Concentration of Felodipine (μg/mL)

Area

5

1034737

5

1089724

10

2071491

10

2184028

15

3091704

15

3256058

20

4102799

20

4319164

25

5112916

25

5379753

30

6132429

30

6452500

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

The HPLC procedure was optimized with a view to develop an accurate assay method for simultaneous estimation of Ramipril and Felodipine in  tablet dosage form using Hypersil BDS C18 column (150 x 4.6 mm, 5 μ) in isocratic mode with mobile phase composition of phosphate buffer pH 5.5: acetonitrile in the ratio of 40: 60 V/V.

.

Fig. 3: Linearity curve of Ramipril

 

Fig. 4: Linearity curve of Felodipine

 

The use of phosphate buffer pH 5.5: acetonitrile in the ratio of 40: 60 V/V resulted in peak with good shape and resolution. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and both the components were measured with UV detector at 243 nm. The results of optimized HPLC conditions were shown in Table 1. The method was linear in the range of 5 to 30 µg/mL for both Ramipril and Felodipine with correlation coefficient of 1 for both Ramipril and Felodipine.  Linear regression data for Ramipril and Felodipine were given in Table 2 and the linearity curves for Ramipril and Felodipine were shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.

 

The % mean recoveries were found to be 99.11% for Ramipril and 98.69% for Felodipine, which indicate the method is accurate. The accuracy results were shown in Table 3. The %RSD for intra-day precision and inter-day precision for Ramipril were found to be 0.08 and 0.21 and for Felodipine were found to be 0.43 and 0.33 respectively, which indicate the method is precise. The precision results were shown in Table 4 and Table 5.


Table 3: Accuracy data for proposed method

Spiked level of drug

Amount added (mg)

Amount found (mg)

% Recovery

Ramipril

Felodipine

Ramipril

Felodipine

Ramipril

Felodipine

50%

50

50

49.44

49.33

98.87

98.67

100%

100

100

99.03

99.09

99.03

99.09

150%

150

150

149.14

147.47

99.43

98.32

 


Table 4: Intra-day precision data of proposed method

S. No.

Ramipril

Felodipine

1

4080549

4303452

2

4081216

4303036

3

4087670

4302876

4

4079065

4303132

5

4079768

4303767

6

4080690

4281387

Average

4081493

4299608

SD

3118.9361

8932.279

%RSD

0.08

0.21

 

Table 5: Inter-day precision data of proposed method

S. No.

Ramipril

Felodipine

1

4081926

4306246

2

4082119

4304373

3

4095831

4315609

4

4103087

4323783

5

4117591

4336791

6

4124223

4337159

Average

4100796.17

4320660

SD

17695.7819

14427.21

%RSD

0.43

0.33

 

The retention time of Ramipril and Felodipine was 2.844 min and 5.727 min respectively. The number of theoretical plates calculated was 2756 for Ramipril and 4232 for Felodipine and symmetry factor was 1.09 for Ramipril and 1.10 for Felodipine, which indicates efficient performance of the column. The LOD for Ramipril and Felodipine were found to be 2.86 µg/mL and 2.21 µg/mL respectively. The LOQ for Ramipril and Felodipine were found to be 8.66 µg/mL and 6.71 µg/mL respectively, which indicate the sensitivity of the method. The summary of system suitability parameters and validation parameters were shown in Table 6. Validated method was applied for the determination of Ramipril and Felodipine in commercial formulations. The % assay was found to be 99.46% and 100.09% for Ramipril and Felodipine respectively and the assay results were shown in Table 7.

 

Table 6: System suitability parameters of proposed method

Parameters

Ramipril

Felodipine

Linearity (µg/mL)

5-30

5-30

Theoretical plates

2756

4232

Symmetry factor

1.09

1.10

Resolution

0.00

10.09

Retention time (min)

2.844

5.727

LOD (µg/mL)

2.86

2.21

LOQ (µg/mL)

8.66

6.71

 


Table 7: Assay results of proposed method

Formulation

Label claim

Amount found

%Assay

 

TRIASYN

Ramipril

Felodipine

Ramipril

Felodipine

Ramipril

Felodipine

5 mg

5 mg

4.973 mg

5.004 mg

99.46%

100.09%

 

Fig. 5: Typical chromatogram of standard for Ramipril and Felodipine

 


 

Typical chromatogram of standard showing the separation of the drugs Ramipril and Felodipine was shown in Fig. 5. No interfering peaks were found in the chromatogram of the formulation within the run time indicating that excipients used in tablet formulations did not interfere with the estimation of the drug by the proposed HPLC method.

 

CONCLUSION:

The developed HPLC method is simple, specific, accurate and precise for the simultaneous estimation of Ramipril and Felodipine in tablet dosage form. The developed method provides good resolution between Ramipril and Felodipine. It was successfully validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, robustness, LOD, LOQ and system suitability in accordance with ICH guidelines. Thus the described method is suitable for routine analysis and quality control of pharmaceutical preparations containing these drugs in combinations.

 

REFERENCES:

1.        L. Pilote, M. Abrahamowicz, M. Eisenberg, K. Humphries, H. Behlouli and J.V. Tu, Effect of different angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors on mortality among elderly patients with congestive heart failure, CMAJ, 2008, 178(10), 1303-1311.

2.        J.E. Frampton and D.H. Peters, Ramipril, an updated review of its therapeutic use in essential hypertension and heart failure, Drugs, 1995, 49(3), 440-466.

3.        P.H. Dunselman and B. Edgar, Felodipine clinical pharmacokinetics, Clin. Pharmacokinet., 1991, 21(6), 418-430.

4.        M.B. El-Hawary, M.T. Khayall and Z. Isaak, Hand Book of Pharmacology, The Scientific Book Center, S.O.P. Press, Cairo, 1985.

5.        K. Sanjay, K. Bharti and A. Navneet, Combination therapy in hypertension: an update, Diabetol. Metab. Syndr., 2010, 2, 44. 

6.        A.E. Fawzy, E.M. Mohamad, H.M. Hussan, M.S. Ghassan and M.S. Nada, Comparative spectrophotometric, spectrofluorometric and high-performance liquid chromatographic study for the quantitative determination of the binary mixture Felodipine and Ramipril in pharmaceutical formulations, Anal. Lett., 2008, 41(4), 853-870.  

7.        M. Rontogianni, C. Markopoulou and J. Koundourellis, HPLC and chemometrically-assisted spectrophotometric estimation of two binary mixtures for combined hypertension therapy, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 2006, 29(18), 2701-2719.  

8.        G. Oskar, M.A. Rosa, F. Nerea, W. Wolfgang, Z. Ralf and D. Sebastian, Development of an LC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of 55 compounds prescribed in combined cardiovascular therapy, J. Chromatogr. B, 2011, 879(3-4), 243-252.

9.        L.R. Snyder, J.J. Kirkland and J.L. Glajch, Practical HPLC method development. 2nd ed., New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1997, 184-185.

10.     ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Q2(R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, International Conference on Harmonisation, Geneva, 2005, 1-13. 

 

 

 

 

Received on 05.08.2013          Modified on 30.08.2013

Accepted on 07.09.2013         © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 6(11): November 2013; Page   1018-1022